Last week I read two forensics textbooks in quick succession: I began with Eoghan Casey’s Digital Evidence and Computer Crime, and then moved on to this one. 

Maybe I just read them in the wrong order, I don’t know. But I found The Basics of Digital Forensics to be a bit too basic, and just not very well written. The information it contained was essentially useful, but it was presented in such an irritating way that I found it quite hard to get through. I got the feeling that Sammons is probably an excellent lecturer, making off-the-cuff amusing remarks and dropping anecdotes and jokes into his lessons, but it doesn’t translate well into a textbook. Perhaps I’m just a bit of a traditionalist; I do tend to like my textbooks to seem… well, textbooky

The number of spelling and grammar mistakes also didn’t help with legibility, though I could have overlooked this if the content had been more compelling. 

Ultimately, I’d recommend giving this one a miss and just diving into Casey’s massive book instead. It’s a more technically difficult read, but it’s worth it in the long run; you’ll actually learn something from that one. 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.